S Naren of ICICI-Prudential AMC warns India’s investors are now the main capital allocators—echoing risky cycles from the ’90s and 2007–10.
Have you ever felt swept away by a rising market—celebrating gains—but stayed awake at night thinking, “What if this joy ride ends abruptly?” That unease is exactly what S Naren, CIO of ICICI-Prudential AMC, is talking about. He’s spotting a shift in India: investors—not banks—are now the backbone of capital allocation. And this time, the stakes carry echoes from the 1990s and the 2007–10 bad-loan era.

In the first three lines, here’s your primary keyword: S Naren ICICI-Prudential AMC. This isn’t market cheerleading—it’s a calm, expert nudge: “Investors, take a breath.”
Let’s unpack why this shift matters, what risks it brings, and how you can stay savvy in an overstretched equity party.
Investors vs. Banks—Who’s Steering the Funding Wheel?
The Changing Dynamics of Capital Allocation
Once upon a time, banks were India’s credit champions. During 2007–10, heavy lending financed big infrastructure projects—many later crumbled into bad loans. In the 1990s, markets had that role: booming IPOs, investors riding wave after wave, only for earnings to underperform.
Today, Naren argues, the spotlight’s back on markets—but with deeper stakes. Investors underwriting IPOs, funding private equity exits, buying promoter stakes, and cheering multinationals offloading shares—all mean investors are the principal capital allocators, not banks.
Think of it like college life: earlier, your parents (banks) paid for tuition, but now you’re fronting your own degrees with student loans (equities). The difference? You own the risk entirely.
Key Takeaway (What You Should Remember)
Investors have assumed the role of capital allocators—a role once held by banks—raising exposure to cycle risks.
The Snared Cheer: Equity Mania—A Double-Edged Sword
When Markets Shine Too Brightly
India’s equity market has been on a tear. IPOs of loss-making “new-age” firms deliver blockbuster returns. Investors are hooked. Naren’s worry? This comfort is fueling risk-taking—past a red line. Buying at 50–60× earnings or putting faith in companies without profits is like binge-watching a cliffhanger series—you feel good now, but what if the finale disappoints?
In the ‘90s, IPO applause faded when earnings didn’t follow, and investors were nursing losses for a decade. That cycle of overconfidence, followed by regret, is exactly the blueprint we risk replicating.
Using an analogy: It’s like cooking biryani with too much masala—you love the aroma now, but if the spice isn’t balanced, the dish spoils fast.
Key Takeaway
High valuations and comfort with loss-making firms may feed enthusiasm now—but could prime the market for sharp corrections.
Over-Concentration: Putting Too Many Eggs in the Equity Basket
Why Diversification Still Matters
Fund houses keep advising diversification—into equity, debt, gold, REITs, liquid funds—yet investors remain “very, very focused” on equities. That over-concentration can amplify losses if the market turns.
Imagine you’re playing cricket and choosing only fast bowlers—even when spin might turn the match. That’s one-dimensional investing. A portfolio without balance is fragile.
“Naren warns,” paraphrasing: this focus on equities, especially at elevated valuations, increases systemic vulnerabilities.
Human-Style Tip
Be like a buffet: have a bit of everything. Equity may be your favorite dish, but the wisest servers (portfolios) offer balance.
Key Takeaway
Equity should be a core but not the only slice of your portfolio—you need stability from varied asset classes.
Patterns Repeating—Lessons from the ’90s and 2007–10
History Doesn’t Repeat Exactly—But It Rhymes
- 1990s IPO boom: Investors chased exciting new listings, but earnings often didn’t materialize—leading to long, painful losses.
- 2007–10 bank lending spree: Easy credit funded projects that turned sour, creating non-performing assets and bank stress.
Naren’s concern: today’s investor-led funding cycle is stitching threads from both stories. Overconfident markets and easy money may mask underlying risks.
Real-User Insight
A friend invested heavily in a loss-making startup’s IPO, thrilled at first gains—but when earnings lagged, their portfolio felt the hit for years. That same friend now spreads his bets across debt and gold.
Key Takeaway
Historical market cycles spotlight two dangers: overconfidence and easy money—both now mirrored in today’s investor-driven funding model.
What You Can Do—Smart Moves in a Cheery Market
Actionable Portfolio Tips
- Set valuation guardrails: Avoid stocks at unsustainable P/E levels without solid growth plans.
- Allocate across asset classes: Even a 60:30:10 split (equity:debt:gold) can buffer shocks.
- Track earnings, not hype: Prioritize companies with improving fundamentals.
- Use SIP discipline: Rather than lump-sum in hype zones, spread your investment.
- Have an exit plan: Decide ahead when to book profits or stem losses to avoid emotional decisions.
Mistakes to Avoid
- Chasing IPOs without asking if the company can sustain growth.
- Believing past returns are a guarantee—markets change.
- Ignoring global and domestic trends that could pivot direction.
Think of your portfolio like a college group project: don’t rely on one person to do all the work. Spread responsibility—or in this case, risk.
Key Takeaway
Take an investor-like approach: diversify, value-check, stay disciplined, and don’t let short-term euphoria cloud long-term sense.
Wrap-Up Summary
In summary, S Naren of ICICI-Prudential AMC urges us to pause and reflect: yes, equity markets in India are thriving, but today’s investor is carrying the risks once borne by banks. When valuations soar, when loss-making firms get funded, and when diversification is neglected, we walk a tightrope over cycles we’ve seen before.
It’s like being the life of the party—but someone eventually needs to pay the bill.
CTA (Call to Action)
Has this changed how you view your own portfolio? Share your mix of equity vs other assets, or a time when enthusiasm met reality in investing. Let’s swap stories, so we all learn—not just by gains, but by smart exits too.

Leave a Reply to Geeta Yadav Cancel reply